(2010 UNIVERSAL PICTURES)
REVIEW
ACTING: Where do I start with a franchise, that for some reason is still getting money to make the franchise. The acting was mediocre and emotional less. Jessica Alba drove me nuts. I cringed every time she showed up on screen. I wanted to scream. Robert DeNiro's one toned acting chops was entertaining for ten minutes, and then i was done.. Ben Stiller transitioned in the movie as a tough character, then changed completely like a bipolar individual. Ben Stiller wasn't consistent or made any sense to the story or the acting. Dustin Hoffman was thankfully still in the movie, who's comedic timing was perfect. I loved Barbara Streisand and Owen Wilson were just as hilarious.-C
CINEMATOGRAPHY: There is nothing unique about this movie. It was truly a movie you have seen over and over and over and unfortunately "Fockers," doesn't try to hide it. It was worse then a bad TV episode.-D-
ENTERTAINMENT: This movie wasn't entertaining. The jokes aren't unique and the same jokes used in the last two movies were used in this movie. So watch the first "Meet the Parents." You will be more entertained then. Thank goodness, Owen Wilson, Barbara Streisand, and Dustin Hoffman, because the jokes they made were still hilarious.-D-
SCRIPT: Two Words: Very Lame. This movie was boring, predictable and i couldn't wait for this film to finish. Meet the Parents was ok, Meet the Fockers was better, but this movie wasn't worth the money it made. I wonder why this movie is still in theaters.F+
OVERALL GRADE: D
RECOMMEND: REGIFT
Agree with your comments except for "Owen Wilson" his character annoyed me throughout the film. There was really no purpose for him to be there.
ReplyDeleteIf it had not been for Barbra and Dustin I would have given the film an F.
Your grade is right on point.
P.S. I like the new page except everything is not about you - LOL!
haha thanks for the comment Ron!
ReplyDelete